« First
... 
6 7 8 9
This thread has been locked by a moderator.
Show staff replies in this thread
14th January 2019 19:49:24 GM Quillon View post »
14th January 2019 21:18:26 GM Quillon View post »
15th January 2019 13:27:49 GM Shadow View post »
15th January 2019 14:30:44 GM Shadow View post »
15th January 2019 14:34:21 GM Quillon View post »
15th January 2019 16:52:25 GM Shadow View post »
15th January 2019 18:55:01 GM Quillon View post »
17th January 2019 16:16:55 GM Shadow View post »
17th January 2019 19:17:33 GM Shadow View post »
19th January 2019 18:02:00 GM Shadow View post »
20th January 2019 16:14:11 GM Shadow View post »
Doeden
Player

Pharos
Level 296
Warrior
18th January 2019 08:10:34

Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Finally this change was needed mages arent supposed to be tanky as they are. Like right now a mage lvl 400 tanks more than a warrior lvl 400 in pvp. I believe with this nerf on NMR everything should be like it is supposed to be.


How many lvl 200 rangers could lvl 400 warrior block?
How many lvl 200 warriorrs could lvl 400 warrior block?

And how many of each a mage could block?

Yes, i agree mages are not supposed to be as tanky vs mages and i believe NMR will be nerfed some.

But by the way. Do you guys know that warriora/rangers spells ignores NMR? So play smart and kill mages on other vocs.



How many mages lvl 200 can a mage lvl 400 tank right now ? 7 or 8

How many mages lvl 200 a warrior lvl 400 can block? Not even 5

Thats what i mean. I understand savage not understanding what i mean since he couldnt read i said PVP and he gaves me examples of pvm but you baltas you are smarter than this come on or you still mad at me because i beat you on chess?



High lvl warriors are tanky vs rangers and warrior. High lvl Mage was only tanky vs mages. We are working on better formula which was too old and not working on high lvls. The NMR was created when there were no h lvls, there was no magic resist eq. Now it has to be adjusted and it will be. Your comment's doesn't help at all and only takes time to read/answer.

And grow up one day. If you wanna play chess games we can do that with stream so you show everyone how you beat me. You sound very immature


It's like Huligan is saying.. Warriors (especially paladins who does not have blind rush) does not even compare to anything in pvp when the warrior have such a hard time catching up and actually hitting the mage/ranger.. so if you want a formula that's pretty darn accurate according to how fight usually be.

Range "Counter" Mage
Mage "Counter" ranger/warrior
Ranger "weak against" warrior
warrior (AY BRO LEMME CATCH UP AND HIT YOU ONE TIME FOR 300 LIKE 2 TIMES IN 2 MIN)
Baltas
Player

Pharos
Level 362
Mage
18th January 2019 08:49:35

Quoting Doeden:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Finally this change was needed mages arent supposed to be tanky as they are. Like right now a mage lvl 400 tanks more than a warrior lvl 400 in pvp. I believe with this nerf on NMR everything should be like it is supposed to be.


How many lvl 200 rangers could lvl 400 warrior block?
How many lvl 200 warriorrs could lvl 400 warrior block?

And how many of each a mage could block?

Yes, i agree mages are not supposed to be as tanky vs mages and i believe NMR will be nerfed some.

But by the way. Do you guys know that warriora/rangers spells ignores NMR? So play smart and kill mages on other vocs.



How many mages lvl 200 can a mage lvl 400 tank right now ? 7 or 8

How many mages lvl 200 a warrior lvl 400 can block? Not even 5

Thats what i mean. I understand savage not understanding what i mean since he couldnt read i said PVP and he gaves me examples of pvm but you baltas you are smarter than this come on or you still mad at me because i beat you on chess?



High lvl warriors are tanky vs rangers and warrior. High lvl Mage was only tanky vs mages. We are working on better formula which was too old and not working on high lvls. The NMR was created when there were no h lvls, there was no magic resist eq. Now it has to be adjusted and it will be. Your comment's doesn't help at all and only takes time to read/answer.

And grow up one day. If you wanna play chess games we can do that with stream so you show everyone how you beat me. You sound very immature


It's like Huligan is saying.. Warriors (especially paladins who does not have blind rush) does not even compare to anything in pvp when the warrior have such a hard time catching up and actually hitting the mage/ranger.. so if you want a formula that's pretty darn accurate according to how fight usually be.

Range "Counter" Mage
Mage "Counter" ranger/warrior
Ranger "weak against" warrior
warrior (AY BRO LEMME CATCH UP AND HIT YOU ONE TIME FOR 300 LIKE 2 TIMES IN 2 MIN)


Thanks God warrior have a weakness. They can hardly catch up with the target in pvp. But everyone has weaknesses. Ranger don't have to catch up, but they are fragile to every vocation, warlock has the lowest blocking abilities (HP POOL) and once NMR will be lowered - mages will be fragile to every class as well with the lowest HP POOL.
Huligan
Player

Pharos
Level 196
Warrior
18th January 2019 09:14:26

Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Doeden:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Finally this change was needed mages arent supposed to be tanky as they are. Like right now a mage lvl 400 tanks more than a warrior lvl 400 in pvp. I believe with this nerf on NMR everything should be like it is supposed to be.


How many lvl 200 rangers could lvl 400 warrior block?
How many lvl 200 warriorrs could lvl 400 warrior block?

And how many of each a mage could block?

Yes, i agree mages are not supposed to be as tanky vs mages and i believe NMR will be nerfed some.

But by the way. Do you guys know that warriora/rangers spells ignores NMR? So play smart and kill mages on other vocs.



How many mages lvl 200 can a mage lvl 400 tank right now ? 7 or 8

How many mages lvl 200 a warrior lvl 400 can block? Not even 5

Thats what i mean. I understand savage not understanding what i mean since he couldnt read i said PVP and he gaves me examples of pvm but you baltas you are smarter than this come on or you still mad at me because i beat you on chess?



High lvl warriors are tanky vs rangers and warrior. High lvl Mage was only tanky vs mages. We are working on better formula which was too old and not working on high lvls. The NMR was created when there were no h lvls, there was no magic resist eq. Now it has to be adjusted and it will be. Your comment's doesn't help at all and only takes time to read/answer.

And grow up one day. If you wanna play chess games we can do that with stream so you show everyone how you beat me. You sound very immature


It's like Huligan is saying.. Warriors (especially paladins who does not have blind rush) does not even compare to anything in pvp when the warrior have such a hard time catching up and actually hitting the mage/ranger.. so if you want a formula that's pretty darn accurate according to how fight usually be.

Range "Counter" Mage
Mage "Counter" ranger/warrior
Ranger "weak against" warrior
warrior (AY BRO LEMME CATCH UP AND HIT YOU ONE TIME FOR 300 LIKE 2 TIMES IN 2 MIN)


Thanks God warrior have a weakness. They can hardly catch up with the target in pvp. But everyone has weaknesses. Ranger don't have to catch up, but they are fragile to every vocation, warlock has the lowest blocking abilities (HP POOL) and once NMR will be lowered - mages will be fragile to every class as well with the lowest HP POOL.

Mages should be the class thats most fragile to every class? They got sick damage out in 1 second and most damage whatever class they attack. I think this change is really good for the game, first NMR going up fast thats good because otherwise low level mages would die to easy and then it goes to a more flat increase when it starts getting OP. Its still super worth taking level for mages by increase damage / HP pool and more? I can be wrong but Im 100% sure this change is good, like really good. Now mages wont be both best damage and survival class in pvp.
Baltas
Player

Pharos
Level 362
Mage
18th January 2019 09:29:14

Quoting Huligan:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Doeden:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Finally this change was needed mages arent supposed to be tanky as they are. Like right now a mage lvl 400 tanks more than a warrior lvl 400 in pvp. I believe with this nerf on NMR everything should be like it is supposed to be.


How many lvl 200 rangers could lvl 400 warrior block?
How many lvl 200 warriorrs could lvl 400 warrior block?

And how many of each a mage could block?

Yes, i agree mages are not supposed to be as tanky vs mages and i believe NMR will be nerfed some.

But by the way. Do you guys know that warriora/rangers spells ignores NMR? So play smart and kill mages on other vocs.



How many mages lvl 200 can a mage lvl 400 tank right now ? 7 or 8

How many mages lvl 200 a warrior lvl 400 can block? Not even 5

Thats what i mean. I understand savage not understanding what i mean since he couldnt read i said PVP and he gaves me examples of pvm but you baltas you are smarter than this come on or you still mad at me because i beat you on chess?



High lvl warriors are tanky vs rangers and warrior. High lvl Mage was only tanky vs mages. We are working on better formula which was too old and not working on high lvls. The NMR was created when there were no h lvls, there was no magic resist eq. Now it has to be adjusted and it will be. Your comment's doesn't help at all and only takes time to read/answer.

And grow up one day. If you wanna play chess games we can do that with stream so you show everyone how you beat me. You sound very immature


It's like Huligan is saying.. Warriors (especially paladins who does not have blind rush) does not even compare to anything in pvp when the warrior have such a hard time catching up and actually hitting the mage/ranger.. so if you want a formula that's pretty darn accurate according to how fight usually be.

Range "Counter" Mage
Mage "Counter" ranger/warrior
Ranger "weak against" warrior
warrior (AY BRO LEMME CATCH UP AND HIT YOU ONE TIME FOR 300 LIKE 2 TIMES IN 2 MIN)


Thanks God warrior have a weakness. They can hardly catch up with the target in pvp. But everyone has weaknesses. Ranger don't have to catch up, but they are fragile to every vocation, warlock has the lowest blocking abilities (HP POOL) and once NMR will be lowered - mages will be fragile to every class as well with the lowest HP POOL.

Mages should be the class thats most fragile to every class? They got sick damage out in 1 second and most damage whatever class they attack. I think this change is really good for the game, first NMR going up fast thats good because otherwise low level mages would die to easy and then it goes to a more flat increase when it starts getting OP. Its still super worth taking level for mages by increase damage / HP pool and more? I can be wrong but Im 100% sure this change is good, like really good. Now mages wont be both best damage and survival class in pvp.


I didn't argue that it's a good change. The idea is okay, but we are trying to find whats the best number. And in test server it was changed by too much. It's like imagine mages had 80% buff. We would see its OP. So we wouldnt take it off right, we wouldnt cap it 10%? we would set it somewhere where it feels okay. So that's why I spent 5hours yesterday and more time before. To contribute and help the staff tweaking formulas.
Kamikaze Moe
Player

Pharos
Level 61
Mage
18th January 2019 09:52:35

bla bla bla bla bla crybaltas
Huligan
Player

Pharos
Level 196
Warrior
18th January 2019 10:03:39 (Last edited 18th January 2019 10:04:40)

Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Huligan:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Doeden:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Finally this change was needed mages arent supposed to be tanky as they are. Like right now a mage lvl 400 tanks more than a warrior lvl 400 in pvp. I believe with this nerf on NMR everything should be like it is supposed to be.


How many lvl 200 rangers could lvl 400 warrior block?
How many lvl 200 warriorrs could lvl 400 warrior block?

And how many of each a mage could block?

Yes, i agree mages are not supposed to be as tanky vs mages and i believe NMR will be nerfed some.

But by the way. Do you guys know that warriora/rangers spells ignores NMR? So play smart and kill mages on other vocs.



How many mages lvl 200 can a mage lvl 400 tank right now ? 7 or 8

How many mages lvl 200 a warrior lvl 400 can block? Not even 5

Thats what i mean. I understand savage not understanding what i mean since he couldnt read i said PVP and he gaves me examples of pvm but you baltas you are smarter than this come on or you still mad at me because i beat you on chess?



High lvl warriors are tanky vs rangers and warrior. High lvl Mage was only tanky vs mages. We are working on better formula which was too old and not working on high lvls. The NMR was created when there were no h lvls, there was no magic resist eq. Now it has to be adjusted and it will be. Your comment's doesn't help at all and only takes time to read/answer.

And grow up one day. If you wanna play chess games we can do that with stream so you show everyone how you beat me. You sound very immature


It's like Huligan is saying.. Warriors (especially paladins who does not have blind rush) does not even compare to anything in pvp when the warrior have such a hard time catching up and actually hitting the mage/ranger.. so if you want a formula that's pretty darn accurate according to how fight usually be.

Range "Counter" Mage
Mage "Counter" ranger/warrior
Ranger "weak against" warrior
warrior (AY BRO LEMME CATCH UP AND HIT YOU ONE TIME FOR 300 LIKE 2 TIMES IN 2 MIN)


Thanks God warrior have a weakness. They can hardly catch up with the target in pvp. But everyone has weaknesses. Ranger don't have to catch up, but they are fragile to every vocation, warlock has the lowest blocking abilities (HP POOL) and once NMR will be lowered - mages will be fragile to every class as well with the lowest HP POOL.

Mages should be the class thats most fragile to every class? They got sick damage out in 1 second and most damage whatever class they attack. I think this change is really good for the game, first NMR going up fast thats good because otherwise low level mages would die to easy and then it goes to a more flat increase when it starts getting OP. Its still super worth taking level for mages by increase damage / HP pool and more? I can be wrong but Im 100% sure this change is good, like really good. Now mages wont be both best damage and survival class in pvp.


I didn't argue that it's a good change. The idea is okay, but we are trying to find whats the best number. And in test server it was changed by too much. It's like imagine mages had 80% buff. We would see its OP. So we wouldnt take it off right, we wouldnt cap it 10%? we would set it somewhere where it feels okay. So that's why I spent 5hours yesterday and more time before. To contribute and help the staff tweaking formulas.

I really think they close too what it should be right now on test server, ofcourse high level mages will disagree but thats what i think. But I respect your work to 100% also said that you would be a good staff member, Zezenia crew really need someone like you in their team.
Gudalik
Player

Pharos
Level 118
Mage
18th January 2019 10:13:09

Quoting Huligan:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Huligan:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Doeden:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Finally this change was needed mages arent supposed to be tanky as they are. Like right now a mage lvl 400 tanks more than a warrior lvl 400 in pvp. I believe with this nerf on NMR everything should be like it is supposed to be.


How many lvl 200 rangers could lvl 400 warrior block?
How many lvl 200 warriorrs could lvl 400 warrior block?

And how many of each a mage could block?

Yes, i agree mages are not supposed to be as tanky vs mages and i believe NMR will be nerfed some.

But by the way. Do you guys know that warriora/rangers spells ignores NMR? So play smart and kill mages on other vocs.



How many mages lvl 200 can a mage lvl 400 tank right now ? 7 or 8

How many mages lvl 200 a warrior lvl 400 can block? Not even 5

Thats what i mean. I understand savage not understanding what i mean since he couldnt read i said PVP and he gaves me examples of pvm but you baltas you are smarter than this come on or you still mad at me because i beat you on chess?



High lvl warriors are tanky vs rangers and warrior. High lvl Mage was only tanky vs mages. We are working on better formula which was too old and not working on high lvls. The NMR was created when there were no h lvls, there was no magic resist eq. Now it has to be adjusted and it will be. Your comment's doesn't help at all and only takes time to read/answer.

And grow up one day. If you wanna play chess games we can do that with stream so you show everyone how you beat me. You sound very immature


It's like Huligan is saying.. Warriors (especially paladins who does not have blind rush) does not even compare to anything in pvp when the warrior have such a hard time catching up and actually hitting the mage/ranger.. so if you want a formula that's pretty darn accurate according to how fight usually be.

Range "Counter" Mage
Mage "Counter" ranger/warrior
Ranger "weak against" warrior
warrior (AY BRO LEMME CATCH UP AND HIT YOU ONE TIME FOR 300 LIKE 2 TIMES IN 2 MIN)


Thanks God warrior have a weakness. They can hardly catch up with the target in pvp. But everyone has weaknesses. Ranger don't have to catch up, but they are fragile to every vocation, warlock has the lowest blocking abilities (HP POOL) and once NMR will be lowered - mages will be fragile to every class as well with the lowest HP POOL.

Mages should be the class thats most fragile to every class? They got sick damage out in 1 second and most damage whatever class they attack. I think this change is really good for the game, first NMR going up fast thats good because otherwise low level mages would die to easy and then it goes to a more flat increase when it starts getting OP. Its still super worth taking level for mages by increase damage / HP pool and more? I can be wrong but Im 100% sure this change is good, like really good. Now mages wont be both best damage and survival class in pvp.


I didn't argue that it's a good change. The idea is okay, but we are trying to find whats the best number. And in test server it was changed by too much. It's like imagine mages had 80% buff. We would see its OP. So we wouldnt take it off right, we wouldnt cap it 10%? we would set it somewhere where it feels okay. So that's why I spent 5hours yesterday and more time before. To contribute and help the staff tweaking formulas.

I really think they close too what it should be right now on test server, ofcourse high level mages will disagree but thats what i think. But I respect your work to 100% also said that you would be a good staff member, Zezenia crew really need someone like you in their team.

Its sad but nothing Will help this game
Doeden
Player

Pharos
Level 296
Warrior
18th January 2019 11:09:03

Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Doeden:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Finally this change was needed mages arent supposed to be tanky as they are. Like right now a mage lvl 400 tanks more than a warrior lvl 400 in pvp. I believe with this nerf on NMR everything should be like it is supposed to be.


How many lvl 200 rangers could lvl 400 warrior block?
How many lvl 200 warriorrs could lvl 400 warrior block?

And how many of each a mage could block?

Yes, i agree mages are not supposed to be as tanky vs mages and i believe NMR will be nerfed some.

But by the way. Do you guys know that warriora/rangers spells ignores NMR? So play smart and kill mages on other vocs.



How many mages lvl 200 can a mage lvl 400 tank right now ? 7 or 8

How many mages lvl 200 a warrior lvl 400 can block? Not even 5

Thats what i mean. I understand savage not understanding what i mean since he couldnt read i said PVP and he gaves me examples of pvm but you baltas you are smarter than this come on or you still mad at me because i beat you on chess?



High lvl warriors are tanky vs rangers and warrior. High lvl Mage was only tanky vs mages. We are working on better formula which was too old and not working on high lvls. The NMR was created when there were no h lvls, there was no magic resist eq. Now it has to be adjusted and it will be. Your comment's doesn't help at all and only takes time to read/answer.

And grow up one day. If you wanna play chess games we can do that with stream so you show everyone how you beat me. You sound very immature


It's like Huligan is saying.. Warriors (especially paladins who does not have blind rush) does not even compare to anything in pvp when the warrior have such a hard time catching up and actually hitting the mage/ranger.. so if you want a formula that's pretty darn accurate according to how fight usually be.

Range "Counter" Mage
Mage "Counter" ranger/warrior
Ranger "weak against" warrior
warrior (AY BRO LEMME CATCH UP AND HIT YOU ONE TIME FOR 300 LIKE 2 TIMES IN 2 MIN)


Thanks God warrior have a weakness. They can hardly catch up with the target in pvp. But everyone has weaknesses. Ranger don't have to catch up, but they are fragile to every vocation, warlock has the lowest blocking abilities (HP POOL) and once NMR will be lowered - mages will be fragile to every class as well with the lowest HP POOL.


There is no point in arguing anymore about this. all you see is from a mage PoV.
the only thing you want is mages to be tanky, high burst and be op.
Clearly cuz you play a mage and you dont want be a balanced class.
That's okay, gl bro
Kamikaze Moe
Player

Pharos
Level 61
Mage
18th January 2019 11:13:57

mimimimimim cry baltas dancore ht savage mimimmiimim cry is free hope they change this mr like it should be im mage and dont complain about it always crying they want to be so tanky tanking 15 ppl combo ur LMOA BRO
Baltas
Player

Pharos
Level 362
Mage
18th January 2019 11:52:04

Quoting Doeden:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Doeden:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Quoting Baltas:
Quoting Rondom:
Finally this change was needed mages arent supposed to be tanky as they are. Like right now a mage lvl 400 tanks more than a warrior lvl 400 in pvp. I believe with this nerf on NMR everything should be like it is supposed to be.


How many lvl 200 rangers could lvl 400 warrior block?
How many lvl 200 warriorrs could lvl 400 warrior block?

And how many of each a mage could block?

Yes, i agree mages are not supposed to be as tanky vs mages and i believe NMR will be nerfed some.

But by the way. Do you guys know that warriora/rangers spells ignores NMR? So play smart and kill mages on other vocs.



How many mages lvl 200 can a mage lvl 400 tank right now ? 7 or 8

How many mages lvl 200 a warrior lvl 400 can block? Not even 5

Thats what i mean. I understand savage not understanding what i mean since he couldnt read i said PVP and he gaves me examples of pvm but you baltas you are smarter than this come on or you still mad at me because i beat you on chess?



High lvl warriors are tanky vs rangers and warrior. High lvl Mage was only tanky vs mages. We are working on better formula which was too old and not working on high lvls. The NMR was created when there were no h lvls, there was no magic resist eq. Now it has to be adjusted and it will be. Your comment's doesn't help at all and only takes time to read/answer.

And grow up one day. If you wanna play chess games we can do that with stream so you show everyone how you beat me. You sound very immature


It's like Huligan is saying.. Warriors (especially paladins who does not have blind rush) does not even compare to anything in pvp when the warrior have such a hard time catching up and actually hitting the mage/ranger.. so if you want a formula that's pretty darn accurate according to how fight usually be.

Range "Counter" Mage
Mage "Counter" ranger/warrior
Ranger "weak against" warrior
warrior (AY BRO LEMME CATCH UP AND HIT YOU ONE TIME FOR 300 LIKE 2 TIMES IN 2 MIN)


Thanks God warrior have a weakness. They can hardly catch up with the target in pvp. But everyone has weaknesses. Ranger don't have to catch up, but they are fragile to every vocation, warlock has the lowest blocking abilities (HP POOL) and once NMR will be lowered - mages will be fragile to every class as well with the lowest HP POOL.


There is no point in arguing anymore about this. all you see is from a mage PoV.
the only thing you want is mages to be tanky, high burst and be op.
Clearly cuz you play a mage and you dont want be a balanced class.
That's okay, gl bro


Ye. I think of mage PoV. Maybe its correct. This thread is about mage vs mage damage. Nothing to do against warrior or ranger
« First
... 
6 7 8 9